2026 D3 WBB NCAA Tournament Bracket Analysis

Sectional hosting, flight projections, win probabilities & path difficulty

The NCAA D3 tournament places 64 teams into 4 quadrants of 16. After two rounds, each quadrant produces 4 Sweet 16 teams that play at a single sectional host site. The NCAA prefers the highest seed to host, but the 500-mile rule means teams 500+ miles away require a flight (paid by NCAA). To minimize flights, a lower seed may host if it keeps more teams within driving distance. This report enumerates all possible 4-team sectionals per quadrant (accounting for tournament results), calculates their probability using efficiency-based win models, and determines the likely host and flight count for each scenario.
LIVE 62 games decided R64: 32R32: 16S16: 8E8: 4

NCAA Title Probabilities

2 teams remaining with a path to the championship

1(1)Scranton92.815%
2(2)Denison7.185%

Overall Summary

4.00
Expected Total Flights (across 4 sectionals)

Expected Flights by Quadrant

Quadrant Exp. Flights
Top Left (NYU) 2.00
Top Right (UW-Oshkosh) 0.00
Bottom Right (Washington & Lee) 1.00
Bottom Left (Scranton) 1.00

Top Hosting Probabilities

Team Host Prob Host if in S16
NYU 100.0% 100%
UW-Oshkosh 100.0% 100%
Washington & Lee 100.0% 100%
Scranton 100.0% 100%
Hardin-Simmons 0.0% 0%
UW-La Crosse 0.0% 0%
Southern Maine 0.0% 0%
WashU 0.0% 0%
Chicago 0.0% 0%
Hope 0.0% 0%

Win Probability & Path Analysis

Probability of each team reaching every tournament round, calculated by propagating efficiency-based win probabilities through the full bracket tree. All games assumed neutral-site. R32 = Round of 32, S16 = Sweet 16, E8 = Elite 8, FF = Final Four, Champ = Championship Game, Win = Win Title.

Easiest Path (1-seeds)
Scranton
Bottom Left — 92.8% Win
Hardest Path (1-seeds)
Washington & Lee
Bottom Right — 0.0% Win
Overall Favorite
(1) Scranton
Bottom Left — 92.8% Win

Full Tournament Path Probabilities

Sum of Win%: 100.00% (sanity check ≈ 100%)
# Seed Team Quadrant R32 S16 E8 FF Champ Win
1 (1) Scranton 🏠 Bottom Left 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92.8%
2 (2) Denison 🏠 Bottom Right 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7.2%
3 (1) NYU 🏠 Top Left 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.000% 0.000%
4 (16) Maine-Farmington Top Left - - - - - -
5 (8) Messiah Top Left 100% - - - - -
6 (9) Cortland Top Left - - - - - -
7 (4) Hardin-Simmons 🏠 Top Left 100% 100% - - - -
8 (13) Austin College Top Left - - - - - -
9 (5) Claremont-Mudd-Scripps ✈️ Top Left - - - - - -
10 (12) Whitman ✈️ Top Left 100% - - - - -
11 (3) UW-La Crosse Top Left 100% 100% 100% - - -
12 (14) LaGrange ✈️ Top Left - - - - - -
13 (6) Carroll 🏠 Top Left 100% - - - - -
14 (11) DePauw Top Left - - - - - -
15 (2) Bowdoin 🏠 Top Left 100% - - - - -
16 (15) Emmanuel Top Left - - - - - -
17 (7) Southern Maine Top Left 100% 100% - - - -
18 (10) Johnson & Wales (RI) Top Left - - - - - -
19 (1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠 Top Right 100% 100% 100% 100% 0.000% 0.000%
20 (16) Webster Top Right - - - - - -
21 (8) Wisconsin Lutheran Top Right 100% - - - - -
22 (9) St. Mary's (MN) Top Right - - - - - -
23 (4) WashU Top Right 100% 100% - - - -
24 (13) SUNY Geneseo Top Right - - - - - -
25 (5) Ohio Wesleyan 🏠 Top Right 100% - - - - -
26 (12) DeSales Top Right - - - - - -
27 (3) UW-Whitewater 🏠 Top Right 100% - - - - -
28 (14) Transylvania Top Right - - - - - -
29 (6) Chicago Top Right 100% 100% 100% - - -
30 (11) Gustavus Adolphus Top Right - - - - - -
31 (2) Hope 🏠 Top Right 100% 100% - - - -
32 (15) Penn State-Behrend Top Right - - - - - -
33 (7) Illinois Wesleyan Top Right 100% - - - - -
34 (10) Washington & Jefferson Top Right - - - - - -
35 (1) Washington & Lee 🏠 Bottom Right 100% 100% 100% - - -
36 (16) St. Mary's (MD) Bottom Right - - - - - -
37 (8) Gettysburg Bottom Right - - - - - -
38 (9) Christopher Newport Bottom Right 100% - - - - -
39 (4) Bethel 🏠 Bottom Right 100% 100% - - - -
40 (13) Millsaps ✈️ Bottom Right - - - - - -
41 (5) UW-Platteville Bottom Right - - - - - -
42 (12) Coe Bottom Right 100% - - - - -
43 (3) John Carroll 🏠 Bottom Right 100% 100% - - - -
44 (14) TCNJ Bottom Right - - - - - -
45 (6) SUNY New Paltz Bottom Right 100% - - - - -
46 (11) Immaculata Bottom Right - - - - - -
47 (15) Southern Virginia Bottom Right - - - - - -
48 (7) Trine Bottom Right 100% - - - - -
49 (10) Shenandoah Bottom Right - - - - - -
50 (16) Framingham St. Bottom Left - - - - - -
51 (8) Otterbein Bottom Left 100% - - - - -
52 (9) Randolph-Macon Bottom Left - - - - - -
53 (4) Bates 🏠 Bottom Left 100% 100% - - - -
54 (13) Merchant Marine Bottom Left - - - - - -
55 (5) Smith Bottom Left 100% - - - - -
56 (12) Union (NY) Bottom Left - - - - - -
57 (3) Concordia Moorhead 🏠 Bottom Left 100% 100% 100% - - -
58 (14) UW-Superior Bottom Left - - - - - -
59 (6) Ripon Bottom Left 100% - - - - -
60 (11) UW-River Falls Bottom Left - - - - - -
61 (2) Johns Hopkins 🏠 Bottom Left 100% 100% - - - -
62 (15) Hunter Bottom Left - - - - - -
63 (7) Baldwin Wallace Bottom Left 100% - - - - -
64 (10) William Paterson Bottom Left - - - - - -

Pod Difficulty Rankings (by Avg Efficiency Margin)

Higher average EM = tougher pod. Teams in harder pods face stronger opponents in the first two rounds.

# Quadrant Pod Avg EM Teams
1 Bottom Left Pod A +26.6 (1) Scranton 🏠(8) Otterbein(9) Randolph-Macon(16) Framingham St.
2 Bottom Left Pod B +25.2 (4) Bates 🏠(5) Smith(12) Union (NY)(13) Merchant Marine
3 Bottom Right Pod A +25.0 (1) Washington & Lee 🏠(8) Gettysburg(9) Christopher Newport(16) St. Mary's (MD)
4 Top Right Pod D +24.4 (2) Hope 🏠(7) Illinois Wesleyan(10) Washington & Jefferson(15) Penn State-Behrend
5 Top Right Pod C +23.9 (3) UW-Whitewater 🏠(6) Chicago(11) Gustavus Adolphus(14) Transylvania
6 Top Left Pod D +23.8 (2) Bowdoin 🏠(7) Southern Maine(10) Johnson & Wales (RI)(15) Emmanuel
7 Top Right Pod B +23.7 (4) WashU(5) Ohio Wesleyan 🏠(12) DeSales(13) SUNY Geneseo
8 Top Left Pod A +23.6 (1) NYU 🏠(8) Messiah(9) Cortland(16) Maine-Farmington
9 Bottom Right Pod D +23.4 (2) Denison 🏠(7) Trine(10) Shenandoah(15) Southern Virginia
10 Bottom Left Pod D +23.3 (2) Johns Hopkins 🏠(7) Baldwin Wallace(10) William Paterson(15) Hunter
11 Top Right Pod A +22.9 (1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠(8) Wisconsin Lutheran(9) St. Mary's (MN)(16) Webster
12 Top Left Pod C +21.5 (3) UW-La Crosse(6) Carroll 🏠(11) DePauw(14) LaGrange ✈️
13 Bottom Right Pod C +20.9 (3) John Carroll 🏠(6) SUNY New Paltz(11) Immaculata(14) TCNJ
14 Bottom Right Pod B +20.1 (4) Bethel 🏠(5) UW-Platteville(12) Coe(13) Millsaps ✈️
15 Bottom Left Pod C +17.1 (3) Concordia Moorhead 🏠(6) Ripon(11) UW-River Falls(14) UW-Superior
16 Top Left Pod B +15.2 (4) Hardin-Simmons 🏠(5) Claremont-Mudd-Scripps ✈️(12) Whitman ✈️(13) Austin College

Quadrant Difficulty Rankings

Average EM of all 16 teams in each quadrant. Harder quadrants reduce championship probability for everyone in them.

# Quadrant Avg EM
1 Top Right (UW-Oshkosh) +23.7
2 Bottom Left (Scranton) +23.1
3 Bottom Right (Washington & Lee) +22.3
4 Top Left (NYU) +21.0

Opponent-Based Path Difficulty

How tough is each team's bracket draw, independent of the team itself? For each round, this shows the expected opponent Adjusted Efficiency Margin (adjEM), weighted by the probability each potential opponent reaches that round. Higher EM = tougher expected opponent. The Total sums all remaining rounds — a team with a high total faces the hardest gauntlet regardless of its own strength. Unlike Win%, which rewards being dominant, this metric purely measures the opponents in your path.

Hardest Path (Overall)
(2) Denison
Bottom Right — Total: +195.4
Easiest Path (Overall)
(1) Scranton
Bottom Left — Total: +164.7
Hardest Path (1-Seeds)
Scranton
Bottom Left — Total: +164.7
Easiest Path (1-Seeds)
Scranton
Bottom Left — Total: +164.7

2 Remaining Teams — Path Difficulty by Round

# Seed Team Quadrant R32 S16 E8 FF Champ Total
1 (2) Denison 🏠 Bottom Right +31.5 +32.9 +34.6 +40.2 +56.2 +195.4
2 (1) Scranton 🏠 Bottom Left +26.9 +29.6 +23.7 +50.5 +34.0 +164.7

Tournament Bracket Map

All 64 bracket teams plotted by location. Colors indicate quadrant assignment. Solid borders = hosts 🏠, dashed borders = flyers ✈️. Click any marker for team details. Click quadrant names in the legend to filter.

Sweet 16 / Sectionals

Sectional Semifinal matchups — hosted at top remaining seeds

Top Left(1) NYU 🏠 vs (4) Hardin-Simmons ✈️FINAL 103-61(3) UW-La Crosse ✈️ vs (7) Southern MaineFINAL 66-45
Top Right(1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠 vs (4) WashUFINAL 64-43(6) Chicago vs (2) HopeFINAL 55-52
Bottom Right(1) Washington & Lee 🏠 vs (4) Bethel ✈️FINAL 75-67(3) John Carroll vs (2) DenisonFINAL 86-67
Bottom Left(1) Scranton 🏠 vs (4) BatesFINAL 76-59(3) Concordia Moorhead ✈️ vs (2) Johns HopkinsFINAL 64-59
4 teams must fly to sectional sites: Hardin-Simmons, UW-La Crosse, Bethel, Concordia Moorhead

Elite 8 / Sectional Finals

Sectional Championship matchups — winners advance to the Final Four

Top Left(1) NYU 🏠 vs (3) UW-La Crosse ✈️FINAL 72-47
Top Right(1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠 vs (6) ChicagoFINAL 73-56
Bottom Right(1) Washington & Lee 🏠 vs (2) DenisonFINAL 77-64
Bottom Left(1) Scranton 🏠 vs (3) Concordia Moorhead ✈️FINAL 67-42

Sweet 16 Head-to-Head

34 games this season between remaining teams — 16 of 16 teams involved

Records vs S16 Field

Seed Team Record
(2) Denison 5-0
(1) Scranton 3-0
(1) NYU 6-1
(4) Bethel 4-1
(1) UW-Oshkosh 5-2
(2) Hope 2-1
(4) Bates 1-1
(1) Washington & Lee 1-1
(4) WashU 2-3
(3) Concordia Moorhead 2-4
(3) UW-La Crosse 2-5
(6) Chicago 1-6
(2) Johns Hopkins 0-1
(7) Southern Maine 0-2
(4) Hardin-Simmons 0-3
(3) John Carroll 0-3

Game Log

Date Winner Pts Loser Pts Margin
03/13 (1) NYU 103 (4) Hardin-Simmons 61 +42
01/10 (4) WashU 68 (6) Chicago 39 +29
02/18 (1) UW-Oshkosh 61 (3) UW-La Crosse 35 +26
03/14 (1) NYU 72 (3) UW-La Crosse 47 +25
03/14 (1) Scranton 67 (3) Concordia Moorhead 42 +25
11/07 (2) Hope 82 (3) UW-La Crosse 61 +21
03/13 (3) UW-La Crosse 66 (7) Southern Maine 45 +21
03/13 (1) UW-Oshkosh 64 (4) WashU 43 +21
03/19 (2) Denison 82 (1) UW-Oshkosh 61 +21
02/20 (1) NYU 82 (4) WashU 62 +20
03/13 (2) Denison 86 (3) John Carroll 67 +19
03/14 (1) UW-Oshkosh 73 (6) Chicago 56 +17
01/17 (2) Denison 58 (3) John Carroll 41 +17
03/13 (1) Scranton 76 (4) Bates 59 +17
01/23 (1) NYU 77 (4) WashU 64 +13
03/14 (2) Denison 77 (1) Washington & Lee 64 +13
02/28 (4) WashU 64 (6) Chicago 52 +12
01/25 (1) NYU 67 (6) Chicago 55 +12
11/25 (4) Bethel 52 (3) Concordia Moorhead 44 +8
03/13 (1) Washington & Lee 75 (4) Bethel 67 +8
03/19 (1) Scranton 60 (1) NYU 52 +8
02/28 (4) Bethel 62 (3) Concordia Moorhead 55 +7
01/07 (1) UW-Oshkosh 55 (3) UW-La Crosse 48 +7
02/14 (2) Denison 57 (3) John Carroll 50 +7
01/24 (4) Bethel 59 (3) Concordia Moorhead 53 +6
12/19 (4) Bethel 63 (3) UW-La Crosse 57 +6
02/11 (2) Hope 63 (4) Hardin-Simmons 57 +6
02/22 (1) NYU 57 (6) Chicago 52 +5
03/13 (3) Concordia Moorhead 64 (2) Johns Hopkins 59 +5
11/25 (4) Bates 70 (7) Southern Maine 66 +4
02/27 (3) UW-La Crosse 52 (1) UW-Oshkosh 49 +3
03/13 (6) Chicago 55 (2) Hope 52 +3
11/08 (1) UW-Oshkosh 60 (6) Chicago 58 +2
12/29 (3) Concordia Moorhead 67 (4) Hardin-Simmons 65 +2

Top Left

#1 NYU 2.00 expected flights

Bracket Pods

Pod A(1) NYU 🏠 vs (16) Maine-FarmingtonFINAL 108-44(8) Messiah vs (9) CortlandFINAL 64-58
Pod B(4) Hardin-Simmons 🏠 vs (13) Austin CollegeFINAL 73-51(5) Claremont-Mudd-Scripps ✈️ vs (12) Whitman ✈️FINAL 70-54
Pod C(3) UW-La Crosse vs (14) LaGrange ✈️FINAL 78-52(6) Carroll 🏠 vs (11) DePauwFINAL 74-67
Pod D(2) Bowdoin 🏠 vs (15) EmmanuelFINAL 51-45(7) Southern Maine vs (10) Johnson & Wales (RI)FINAL 62-46

Sweet 16 Probabilities

Pod Seed Team Sweet 16 % Bar
A (1) NYU 🏠 100%
(16) Maine-Farmington ELIM
(8) Messiah ELIM
(9) Cortland ELIM
B (4) Hardin-Simmons 🏠 100%
(13) Austin College ELIM
(5) Claremont-Mudd-Scripps ✈️ ELIM
(12) Whitman ✈️ ELIM
C (3) UW-La Crosse 100%
(14) LaGrange ✈️ ELIM
(6) Carroll 🏠 ELIM
(11) DePauw ELIM
D (7) Southern Maine 100%
(2) Bowdoin 🏠 ELIM
(15) Emmanuel ELIM
(10) Johnson & Wales (RI) ELIM

Who Hosts? (when they make the Sweet 16)

Team Host Prob Host if in S16 Bar
NYU 100.0% 100%

All 1 Possible Sweet 16 Sectionals

# Prob Cum. Sweet 16 Teams Host Flights Flying
1 100.00% 100.0% (1) NYU 🏠(4) Hardin-Simmons 🏠(3) UW-La Crosse(7) Southern Maine NYU 2 Hardin-Simmons 🏠, UW-La Crosse

Top Right

#1 UW-Oshkosh 0.00 expected flights

Bracket Pods

Pod A(1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠 vs (16) WebsterFINAL 53-37(8) Wisconsin Lutheran vs (9) St. Mary's (MN)FINAL 65-47
Pod B(4) WashU vs (13) SUNY GeneseoFINAL 65-53(5) Ohio Wesleyan 🏠 vs (12) DeSalesFINAL 68-53
Pod C(3) UW-Whitewater 🏠 vs (14) TransylvaniaFINAL 70-65(6) Chicago vs (11) Gustavus AdolphusFINAL 60-44
Pod D(2) Hope 🏠 vs (15) Penn State-BehrendFINAL 103-65(7) Illinois Wesleyan vs (10) Washington & JeffersonFINAL 61-53

Sweet 16 Probabilities

Pod Seed Team Sweet 16 % Bar
A (1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠 100%
(16) Webster ELIM
(8) Wisconsin Lutheran ELIM
(9) St. Mary's (MN) ELIM
B (4) WashU 100%
(13) SUNY Geneseo ELIM
(5) Ohio Wesleyan 🏠 ELIM
(12) DeSales ELIM
C (6) Chicago 100%
(3) UW-Whitewater 🏠 ELIM
(14) Transylvania ELIM
(11) Gustavus Adolphus ELIM
D (2) Hope 🏠 100%
(15) Penn State-Behrend ELIM
(7) Illinois Wesleyan ELIM
(10) Washington & Jefferson ELIM

Who Hosts? (when they make the Sweet 16)

Team Host Prob Host if in S16 Bar
UW-Oshkosh 100.0% 100%

All 1 Possible Sweet 16 Sectionals

# Prob Cum. Sweet 16 Teams Host Flights Flying
1 100.00% 100.0% (1) UW-Oshkosh 🏠(4) WashU(6) Chicago(2) Hope 🏠 UW-Oshkosh 0 -

Bottom Right

#1 Washington & Lee 1.00 expected flights

Bracket Pods

Pod A(1) Washington & Lee 🏠 vs (16) St. Mary's (MD)FINAL 73-44(8) Gettysburg vs (9) Christopher NewportFINAL 74-62
Pod B(4) Bethel 🏠 vs (13) Millsaps ✈️FINAL 81-73(5) UW-Platteville vs (12) CoeFINAL 69-51
Pod C(3) John Carroll 🏠 vs (14) TCNJFINAL 84-49(6) SUNY New Paltz vs (11) ImmaculataFINAL 67-51
Pod D(2) Denison 🏠 vs (15) Southern VirginiaFINAL 82-47(7) Trine vs (10) ShenandoahFINAL 90-45

Sweet 16 Probabilities

Pod Seed Team Sweet 16 % Bar
A (1) Washington & Lee 🏠 100%
(16) St. Mary's (MD) ELIM
(8) Gettysburg ELIM
(9) Christopher Newport ELIM
B (4) Bethel 🏠 100%
(13) Millsaps ✈️ ELIM
(5) UW-Platteville ELIM
(12) Coe ELIM
C (3) John Carroll 🏠 100%
(14) TCNJ ELIM
(6) SUNY New Paltz ELIM
(11) Immaculata ELIM
D (2) Denison 🏠 100%
(15) Southern Virginia ELIM
(7) Trine ELIM
(10) Shenandoah ELIM

Who Hosts? (when they make the Sweet 16)

Team Host Prob Host if in S16 Bar
Washington & Lee 100.0% 100%

All 1 Possible Sweet 16 Sectionals

# Prob Cum. Sweet 16 Teams Host Flights Flying
1 100.00% 100.0% (1) Washington & Lee 🏠(4) Bethel 🏠(3) John Carroll 🏠(2) Denison 🏠 Washington & Lee 1 Bethel 🏠

Bottom Left

#1 Scranton 1.00 expected flights

Bracket Pods

Pod A(1) Scranton 🏠 vs (16) Framingham St.FINAL 104-39(8) Otterbein vs (9) Randolph-MaconFINAL 60-45
Pod B(4) Bates 🏠 vs (13) Merchant MarineFINAL 71-57(5) Smith vs (12) Union (NY)FINAL 73-55
Pod C(3) Concordia Moorhead 🏠 vs (14) UW-SuperiorFINAL 73-61(6) Ripon vs (11) UW-River FallsFINAL 84-81
Pod D(2) Johns Hopkins 🏠 vs (15) HunterFINAL 100-59(7) Baldwin Wallace vs (10) William PatersonFINAL 75-51

Sweet 16 Probabilities

Pod Seed Team Sweet 16 % Bar
A (1) Scranton 🏠 100%
(16) Framingham St. ELIM
(8) Otterbein ELIM
(9) Randolph-Macon ELIM
B (4) Bates 🏠 100%
(13) Merchant Marine ELIM
(5) Smith ELIM
(12) Union (NY) ELIM
C (3) Concordia Moorhead 🏠 100%
(14) UW-Superior ELIM
(6) Ripon ELIM
(11) UW-River Falls ELIM
D (2) Johns Hopkins 🏠 100%
(15) Hunter ELIM
(7) Baldwin Wallace ELIM
(10) William Paterson ELIM

Who Hosts? (when they make the Sweet 16)

Team Host Prob Host if in S16 Bar
Scranton 100.0% 100%

All 1 Possible Sweet 16 Sectionals

# Prob Cum. Sweet 16 Teams Host Flights Flying
1 100.00% 100.0% (1) Scranton 🏠(4) Bates 🏠(3) Concordia Moorhead 🏠(2) Johns Hopkins 🏠 Scranton 1 Concordia Moorhead 🏠